CRM · Close review

Close

Sales CRM with built-in calling and SMS — built for high-velocity outbound and inside sales.

Quick snapshot

  • Category: CRM
  • Best for: Teams running call-heavy motions who want activity timelines tight to deals.
  • Typical cost (modeled): $9–$139 per user/month (aggregated public list range). StackScan engine anchor ~$420/mo at ~25 seats (not a vendor quote).
  • Stack role: Point solution that blends CRM + communication; can reduce separate dialer tooling.
  • StackScan composite (engine): 81/100 — context: mid-size team, balanced efficiency goal (does not replace your intake run).
  • Authority profile score: 72/100 — StackSignal tool intelligence
  • Aggregated review score (dataset): 89/100 from multi-directory research — useful as a secondary signal, not a buy score.

What this tool does

Close optimizes for reps making calls and sending texts from the same workspace they manage pipeline. It is intentionally less "enterprise all-in-one" and more execution-focused — which can lower stack count or overlap with separate dialers.

Core capabilities

  • Power dialer workflows and call logging tied to leads
  • SMS and email in one threaded timeline
  • Automation for follow-ups and tasks

Pricing breakdown

Model: Per user/month, tiered (no free plan; 30-day money-back guarantee)

Close pricing (public range): $9–$139 per user/month (aggregated public list range). Use keywords like 'close pricing' when comparing quotes — list ≠ net.

Dataset anchor ~$99/user/mo and ~$990/mo for a modeled team row — verify against your quote.

Transparency: high — treat renewals, onboarding, and overage as first-class line items.

How pricing scales: seats, edition tier, implementation partners, and add-on clouds usually dominate TCO — not the entry SKU on the website.

Hidden costs (critical):

  • G2: Solo $9, Essentials $35, Growth $99, Scale $139, Enterprise custom (annual)
  • TrustRadius: Confirms tiered pricing; Solo tier limited to 1 user and 10K leads

Strengths

  • Strong fit when outbound throughput is the bottleneck.
  • Reduces context switching between CRM and dialer for many teams.
  • Built-in native dialer (power + predictive), email sync, and SMS
  • Clean intuitive UI consistently rated above Salesforce/HubSpot for ease
  • Automatic activity logging reduces manual data entry
  • Strong and responsive customer support
  • Purpose-built for outbound/phone-heavy sales workflows

Weaknesses

  • Not the default pick for complex multi-department data models.
  • Marketing attribution depth may still require another hub.
  • High per-user cost at Growth ($99) and Scale ($139) tiers
  • Weak reporting, analytics, and dashboard customization
  • Limited enterprise scalability and advanced permissions
  • Email-only support (no phone or live chat)
  • Fewer native integrations; relies heavily on Zapier

Common overlaps

  • HubSpot CRM
  • Salesloft
  • Outreach
  • Aircall

Close alternatives

Use these clusters when searching "close alternatives".

Direct competitors

  • HubSpot CRM
  • Salesforce
  • Pipedrive

Lower-cost alternatives

  • Pipedrive
  • Freshsales
  • Monday CRM

Modern / AI-native alternatives

  • Apollo.io
  • HubSpot CRM
  • Attio

When you should use it

  • You measure success by connect rates and call tasks completed.
  • You want fewer separate comms licenses.

When you should not

  • You are account-based with long cycles and minimal phone outreach.
  • Compliance constraints forbid bundled dialing — validate recording and regions.

StackSwap take

Close shines for call-first teams; StackScan catches it when you also pay for engagement platforms that duplicate dialing and sequences.

Related guides

Compared with

Internal links that support programmatic SEO clustering for close alternatives.

Run StackScan to see if Close is costing you money — especially against duplicate CRM or data vendors you already pay for.

Run StackScan