Stack consolidation · Deep analysis

Moz and Semrush: Cut Moz, Keep Semrush (Usually)

Semrush covers everything Moz does plus PPC, social, and broader marketing intelligence. Moz survives in stacks because Domain Authority got referenced in a report once and no one canceled it.

SEO tooling overlap is one of the easier consolidation wins in modeled marketing stacks.

Which one to keep — by team profile

Under ~500 users (SMB / mid-market)Semrush. Even at the lowest Semrush tier, you get more than Moz Pro at comparable price. Exception: Moz Local for multi-location SEO.
Enterprise (500+ users, multi-cloud)Semrush. No serious enterprise SEO use case favors Moz over Semrush at this point.
Data-led / warehouse-anchoredSemrush. Better API, broader data surface, more credible for warehouse pipelines.
AI-native / greenfieldSemrush. AI features (ContentShake, ImpactHero) are more mature than Moz's AI capabilities.

What they both do (why they overlap)

What's unique to each

Moz· 60/100Semrush· 60/100
Lowest entry pricing in the credible SEO category ($49/mo)PPC keyword research + competitor ad analysis
Domain Authority — industry-standard reference metricSocial media management + analytics
Moz Local for multi-location listings management (genuinely best-in-class)Mature agency / multi-client features
Strong educational content (Whiteboard Friday, Moz Blog)Broader local SEO + listings beyond Moz Local
Larger educational ecosystem with certifications
Materially larger backlink + keyword indexes

The cost reality nobody puts on the comparison chart

Moz Pro Standard $99/mo. Moz Pro Medium $179/mo. Semrush Pro $139.95/mo. At Pro tier, Moz and Semrush price similarly — but Semrush delivers materially more capability per dollar.

The legacy contract problem: Moz often survives in stacks because it's been there longer than the senior SEO. New hires use Semrush or Ahrefs; Moz keeps renewing because no one owns the cancellation. Annual waste: $1K-$3K per Moz Pro seat.

The Moz Local exception: $14/mo per location for multi-location SEO is genuinely best-in-class. If Moz Local is the wedge, keep that and cancel Moz Pro. Don't keep Moz Pro just because Moz Local is doing real work.

When keeping both is defensible (rare)

Multi-location businesses where Moz Local is the multi-location anchor AND Domain Authority reporting is required for client deliverables.

How StackScan sees this overlap

Moz + Semrush is the canonical 'legacy contract that survived a tool refresh' pattern. The senior SEO migrated to Semrush years ago; Moz keeps renewing because the cancellation never made it onto anyone's quarterly priorities. Easiest consolidation win in the SEO category.

StackScan models this as a fast-payback consolidation: cancel Moz Pro at next renewal. Recovery $1K-$3K/yr per seat, and 0 days of migration overhead since Semrush already covers the use cases.

Knowledge base links

Related overlap decisions

FAQ

Should we keep Moz for Domain Authority specifically?
Only if client deliverables specifically reference DA. Semrush has Authority Score (AS) which is functionally equivalent. The 'industry standard' status of DA matters less than it did 3 years ago.
Is Moz Pro really that much weaker than Semrush?
On data depth, yes — Moz's keyword and backlink indexes are materially smaller. On UX, Moz is cleaner than Semrush. On price-per-feature, Semrush wins.
What about Ahrefs instead of Semrush?
Ahrefs is the better SEO-only tool (cleaner UX, larger backlink index). Semrush is the better marketing-suite tool (PPC + social + content).
When should we keep Moz Local but cut Moz Pro?
If you have 10+ business locations and need centralized listings management, Moz Local is genuinely best-in-class. Cancel Moz Pro and keep just Moz Local — billed separately.
Migration disruption?
Near-zero. If your team already uses Semrush, just cancel Moz at renewal. The only thing that doesn't transfer is historical Moz rank tracking data — export it before cancellation if you need the historical record.

Canonical URL: https://stackswap.ai/overlap/moz-and-semrush